All of this was covered live on television. The violence and bias threatened to taint the Democratic Party. In , the Iowa Republican Party followed the Democrats , and they began holding caucuses on the same early date.
That increased the visibility of the Iowa caucuses out of proportion to their actual numeric influence in the nominating convention, where in Iowa will send only 49 delegates out of the estimated total of 4, Democratic delegates. In fact, the caucuses are in large part a media event, a beauty contest, as scholars Hugh Winebrenner and Dennis J.
Goldford have suggested. A legendary event occurred in , when Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, who came in third , was cheering on his supporters as he contemplated a national campaign. But a microphone malfunction amplified his enthusiasm. In a first-term senator, Barack Obama, won the Iowa caucuses , propelling him to a hard-fought nomination and two terms in the White House.
On caucus night, registered Democrats and Republican voters gather at roughly 1, precinct meeting places. In , Democrats will also have satellite caucuses , some even held overseas. There are speeches by supporters for each candidate who gather into groups for each candidate.
The numbers in each group are counted. Once the viable groups have been declared, a complex mathematical calculation determines how many delegates are allocated to each surviving candidate. Hart noticed that Iowa was going to be first in the nation and decided to make a bid here as a way to get McGovern a media boost before the New Hampshire primary. It worked. In , Jimmy Carter replicated McGovern's success. The media paid attention paid to his performance in Iowa and it illustrated the caucuses as an important metric of a candidate's strength.
Carter went on to become president. Prompted by Carter's re-election loss in , the national Democratic Party theorized that the drawn-out nomination process was more of a hindrance than a help to their party's nominee. They rolled out new rules that would restrict how early any state's nomination processes could be held, but still allowed Iowa to caucus first. At that point, it seemed like everyone was happy. Then, Vermont moved up the date of its straw poll.
In response, New Hampshire made its primary earlier. In defiance of the national party, Iowa chose to move the caucuses earlier than its nationally assigned date to maintain the buffer between the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary.
In November of , with the caucuses soon approaching, state party officials gathered to resolve the disagreement and vote on the official date. Those in favor of the earlier date wanted to preserve both Iowa and New Hampshire's unique roles in the nomination process. Those in favor of the later date wanted the whole process shortened to help the eventual nominee.
The party leaders voted for the earlier date. However, its placement as the first candidate-selecting event of the presidential election cycle on February 3 in creates the potential for Iowa voters to have a big influence in elevating some contenders or eliminating others, which can set the tone for the primary voting season.
The caucuses receive lots of attention from both candidates and media. How exactly did that happen? According to Time , the state rose to prominence in presidential politics starting in , the year of the first presidential election after the contentious Democratic convention. Changes to the election calendar meant Iowa was the first delegate-selection event of the cycle. That signified the beginning of Iowa as a possible early indicator of success, according to The Atlantic. Today, doing well in Iowa can give successful candidates the momentum to raise money and is often a determiner of success.
Iowa has even written its placement as the first election-season event into law. But just as Iowa gained power as the first caucus, New Hampshire similarly rose to importance with its position as the first state to hold a presidential primary each cycle.
According to the Brookings Institution , while New Hampshire has held this position since , it was only in , when Richard F. Upon, the speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives at the time, passed a law that allowed New Hampshire citizens to vote for presidential candidates directly instead of selecting local delegates for the convention , that the state gained prominence for its role in presidential politics.
After the Truman administration faltered amid political scandals and the strain of the Korean War, his loss of the New Hampshire primary drove him to withdraw from the race.
0コメント