If this was somehow once-per-turn, I think an argument could be made for Dandylion coming off the list. If its effect was limited like that it'd be great, but perhaps not worthy of a perma-ban until the end of time. But that's not what we're talking about! Konami, please don't errata this card to nerf it down. No one likes nerfs on old cards.
Link Monsters presented a big problem to the Yu-Gi-Oh game engine; the mechanic fundamentally changed how cards were designed. Synchro, Fusion, Pendulum, and XYZ Monsters could only abuse tokens so much - limitations were built into each summoning mechanic.
But Links? Dandylion said "Sign me up! Other token generators like Phantom Skyblaster , Linkross , and Blackwing - Gofu the Vague Shadow are just as busted in theory; they deserve their Forbidden status, but they all have niche stipulations that keep them in line, at least a little bit.
They're all pretty easy to abuse, don't get me wrong, but nothing's as easy as Dandylion. Dandylion just needs to go to the graveyard. That's it. It's really easy to cycle cards in and out of the graveyard, so the repetitive hellscape that Dandylion would usher into modern Yu-Gi-Oh isn't something I'd want to witness.
In other words, "No thanks. It'd be about a hundred times worse in Typically, cards that "break" the basic functions of Yu-Gi-Oh tend to get banned.
But even if something isn't absolutely broken at the time of printing, future cards may elevate older cards in ways that were just impossible to anticipate when those problem-cards were printed years earlier. I mean, look at Makyura the Destructor.
The only reason that got off the list is thanks to an errata. And now it's useless. Ultimate Offering an example of a cards that let you cheat the mechanics of the game. Summoning extra monsters back in the day normally came at the cost of raw card economy: you'd have to give up extra cards to make it happen, at a time when Yu-Gi-Oh was much more focused on card advantage. Believe it or not, Yu-Gi-Oh used to be decided largely by who had more cards. Many cards were 1-for-1 trades, like Smashing Ground , Mystical Space Typhoon , and Sakuretsu Armor , and that decided the outcome of many duels.
So extra Normal Summons probably only gained you larger monsters, often through Tribute Summons. Unless you could capitalize quickly on a Zaborg the Thunder Monarch , a Jinzo , or an Airknight Parshath , those extra summons weren't very helpful. Sure, there were a few OTKs with cards like the iconic Cannon Soldier and the embarrassingly dull Black Ptera , but those didn't go very far. Gadget and Machina monsters found solace in Ultimate Offering , but decks focused around that interaction just weren't good enough to warrant a ban.
But surprise! Modern Yu-Gi-Oh hasn't slowed down. Extra Normal Summons for a mere Life Points eventually got too good, and unless they stop printing cards, Ultimate Offering will only get better and better. I'm not kidding when I say cards like Ultimate Offering are so good that literally every card that's printed in the future makes Ultimate Offering better.
How did this card stay around for so long? Historically speaking, there was a long period where Spell Counters were difficult to come by. But not anymore! Endymion cards and Mythical Knights helped Spell Counters proliferate, shifting the balance of power on several notable cards. I think everyone saw it coming, too: it was only a matter of time before Tempest Magician turned into a disaster, and it was clear that it could never do anything healthy for the game.
Remember Mass Driver? I'd argue that Extra Deck monsters are more of a danger since they're easier to get to consistently than Main Decked spell cards, so there was more reason to ban something like Tempest Magician anyway. In other words, Tempest Magician should stay Forbidden forever. What good does it do for the game? Does it make any strategies more fun? Does it increase player interaction? This card isn't good unless it's doing something entirely unfair; it's either useless, or a problem.
Cast it into the fire for eternity, I say. Honestly, I feel that way about virtually every new card that does burn damage. We would love more volunteers to help us with our Card of the Day reviews. If you want to share your ideas on cards with other fans, feel free to drop us an email.
Click here to read over more Yu-Gi-Oh! Cards of the Day! Home Yu-Gi-Oh! Card of the Day Yu-Gi-Oh! Forums Yu-Gi-Oh! News Yu-Gi-Oh! Vanguard Cardfight!! Vanguard Card of the Day Archive — Pojo.
Thursday, November 11, Message Board Contact Us. Sign in. Forgot your password? Klovasos , 13 January UTC. One card can actually make a difference, especially if its a limited cheap card or a card like lightning vortex, to turn around the duel, MoF should stay banned since its a unbalanced card obviously.
Cloak , 26 January UTC. MoF should definitely be unbanned. Still though, I think she should be major limited, as having three copies would just really break the game, and only two would make it a little more challenging, but not as fair as only one. I think it should be unbanned now. At the time it was released it was a threat. But now there are lots of ways to negate flip effects.
Wiki Explore. Structure Deck R Starter Decks. Game terms. Summoning conditions Normal Summon Flip Summon. Flip Gemini Union Spirit Toon. OCG Structures. Explore Wikis Community Central.
Register Don't have an account? Lists Discussion. Forum:Magician of Faith. View source. History Talk 0. See Help:Signature and Help:Talk pages for further information. This forum thread has been unedited for days and is considered archived.
0コメント