Does anyone still play aa2




















I was really excited about AA3, up until I heard it was prematurely released and the dev team immediately fired thereafter.

I tried AA3 during the first week or so that it was released, and it was so buggy I couldn't even get through the menu, and to add insult to injury, it would not accept my username from or so, even after the dev team gave a quick try at making it work, since it was 4 characters and too short for the newly introduced minimum limit.

With a new username and as a result the lost of connection to some old AA2 gamer friends, paired with a game so buggy I could not get through the menu, I scratched it off my list. I thought about it today though, and I thought I'd check and see how AA3 now fares.

For those of you who played AA2, how does it compare? I'm downloading it now, but I thought I would post and see what input you could provide. I had some great times with AA2. I may even scrouge up the last version of AA2 that supported Linux and see if there's still a community that plays that version as a result of it being the last Linux version.

Thanks, DrCR. AA3 is horrible I don't remember the specifics, but I'm pretty sure 2. The game may be old but the maps are still pretty good.

Those are it, man! Top notch, best of the best ever played. Posts: Player. I don't remember which patch, but I liked AA2 before they started adding all the dumb maps maps like water treatment.

Somewhere after SF launch, but before 2. Sign In or Register to comment. If you would like to take part in the discussions, sign in below! Sign In Register. Categories Recent Discussions Activity Participated.

Categories 6. And such small timelimit is very bad,most time only stupid rushing. Become PG maps they are without timelimit so that you can play it like a tacticshooter and not like as a COD-clone? Its important to move slowly in tacticshooter and not run like a chicken through the maps. Hope with a patch you can have great matches like in aa2 always the best or aa3,but only to play with min timelimit makes no fun and real tactical gameplay and slowly moving in a squad is impossible!!!

And very idiotic is that everybogy runs alone,its very unrealistic! In tacticalshooter you must move in squad like in the great aa2 but in PG all play only "Rambo" and move alone. So you can see the very bad tactical gameplay in PG,in reallife you will found no soldier who runs alone. Most important to move together so you can cover each others.

Only sniper can move alone. All look only at their own frags,many dont know how to play tactical. Best example is again AA2. Look some videos or remember when you played it. So PG is only a bad joke when you look the great and tactical gameplay in aa2.

Firefights in PG are a idiotic to. Shooting during strafe left and right Will we ever become a "real" tactical game or come only cod number ? Perhaps we become a good tactical gameGround Branch but the devs make only blabla and dont know when it ever will be released.

But in this status PG is only a very bad rusher game and "tactical shooter" is the wrong word for PG in this status but i think the devs will not change the stupid rusher-gameplay. I would love you guys. PG goes to easy mainstream-gameplay like other games too. I dont think so PG will be a good or serious tactical game after patches.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000